Skip to main content

Developer Adoption Score

Find out how your homepage, docs, and signup experience look to developers. Get a detailed assessment through our expert framework that simulates how developers really evaluate products.

What you get

  • Score across 12 critical categories
  • Specific friction points and red flags
  • Quick wins you can fix right away
  • Expert insights to guide improvements

Your score will arrive within 24 hours of submission. We're not getting the expected results from our model every time, so we've chosen to manually review them all before emailing them. We promise it's worth the wait!

Check Out an Example

🎯 WeWeb Developer Adoption Score

Audit Date: June 2, 2025
Framework: Built for Devs v1.0
Evaluator: Experienced Developer Simulation

📊 Final Score & Classification

  • Base Score: 79/120
  • Red Flag Deductions: -15
  • Final Score: 64/120
  • Classification: ⚠️ Needs Work – Significant barriers to adoption

📈 Detailed Score Breakdown

First Impression

  • Developer Recognition Signals: 4/10
    The homepage lacks immediate developer cues. There's no prominent GitHub link or "Docs" in the top navigation. The hero messaging focuses on "AI" and "no-code," which may not resonate with developers seeking control and clarity. The "Start building" CTA is self-serve, which is positive.

  • Value Proposition Clarity: 5/10
    The product is described as a "no-code front-end builder," but it's unclear how it integrates with existing developer workflows. The emphasis on AI and speed may seem like marketing fluff without substantiation.

Homepage Deep Dive

  • Technical Credibility: 6/10
    Mentions exporting to Vue.js SPA and GitHub integration, which are developer-friendly. However, no architecture diagrams or performance metrics were found.

  • Trust & Social Proof: 5/10
    Displays logos of companies like L'Oréal and PwC, but lacks developer-specific testimonials or GitHub credibility signals.

  • Integration Context: 7/10
    Supports REST, GraphQL, Xano, Supabase, Airtable. Great backend compatibility, but lacks SDK/CLI mentions.

Documentation Assessment

  • Documentation Quality: 7/10
    Docs include REST API integration and collection setup. However, there is no getting started guide or interactive examples.

  • Technical Depth: 6/10
    Covers workflows and APIs, but lacks edge case documentation, testing practices, or complete API reference.

Self-Serve Experience

  • Trial Accessibility: 8/10
    Free tier available and no credit card required to start building.

  • Developer Tooling: 5/10
    Mentions CLI tool for components, but it's hidden. Missing Postman collections, testing tools, code snippets.

Community & Support

  • Developer Support Quality: 6/10
    Has a community forum and live chat. No GitHub issues, discussions, or strong Stack Overflow presence.

  • Learning Resources: 5/10
    Tutorials and changelog exist. Missing in-depth blog content, sample apps, and competitive migration guides.

Overall Experience

  • Product Cohesion: 5/10
    Mix of marketing-heavy and sparse technical content. Needs unified, developer-centric experience.

🚩 Critical Issues Found

  • Unclear Product Definition
    A developer cannot quickly tell what WeWeb is or how it fits into their workflow. Messaging lacks clarity, which delays evaluation.

  • Lack of Stack Integration Visibility
    While some integrations are supported, they are not emphasized clearly enough in initial touchpoints.

⚠️ Red Flags Identified

Red Flag Deduction Developer Thinking
Buzzword-heavy messaging -5 "Marketing fluff over technical substance"
No GitHub/code visibility -3 "What are they hiding?"
No pricing transparency -4 "Hidden costs are a red flag"
Slow loading times -3 "If their site is slow, their service probably is too"

Total Red Flag Deductions: -15

🎯 Quick Wins (1–2 Weeks)

  1. Add a prominent "Docs" link in top nav
    Improves discoverability for developer audiences.

  2. Include a GitHub link with activity metrics
    Establishes transparency and trust.

  3. Clarify homepage messaging toward developers
    Eliminates fluff and communicates developer value.

  4. Create a clear getting started guide or tutorial
    Streamlines onboarding.

  5. Surface CLI tooling and dev-focused capabilities
    Makes developer utilities easier to find and use.

🚀 Strategic Opportunities (1–3 Months)

  1. Develop robust API references and SDKs

    • Problem: Sparse API documentation
    • Impact: Developers need examples and structured guides
    • Action: Build API docs + SDKs for JS, Python, etc.

  2. Invest in GitHub and Stack Overflow presence

    • Problem: No real community footprint
    • Impact: Missed engagement and support signals
    • Action: Build repos, answer questions, enable discussions

💡 Competitive Differentiation Opportunities

  • Market WeWeb as a hybrid no-code/low-code dev tool
    Emphasize dev control via exports, Vue.js, GitHub, etc.

  • Publish technical case studies with architecture diagrams
    Earn credibility with devs and technical decision-makers.

  • Offer integrations with dev tools (IDE plugins, CI/CD)
    Create dev-first workflows that reduce friction.