Developer Adoption Score
Find out how your homepage, docs, and signup experience look to developers. Get a detailed assessment through our expert framework that simulates how developers really evaluate products.
Our tool is currently being improved and is offline. Sorry for the inconvenience.
What you get
- Developer adoption score across 12 critical categories
- Specific friction points and red flags
- Quick wins you can fix right away
- Expert insights to guide improvements
Check Out an Example
π― WeWeb Developer Adoption Score
Audit Date: June 2, 2025
Framework: Built for Devs v1.0
Evaluator: Experienced Developer Simulation
π Final Score & Classification
- Base Score: 79/120
- Red Flag Deductions: -15
- Final Score: 64/120
- Classification: β οΈ Needs Work β Significant barriers to adoption
π Detailed Score Breakdown
First Impression
-
Developer Recognition Signals: 4/10
The homepage lacks immediate developer cues. There's no prominent GitHub link or "Docs" in the top navigation. The hero messaging focuses on "AI" and "no-code," which may not resonate with developers seeking control and clarity. The "Start building" CTA is self-serve, which is positive. -
Value Proposition Clarity: 5/10
The product is described as a "no-code front-end builder," but it's unclear how it integrates with existing developer workflows. The emphasis on AI and speed may seem like marketing fluff without substantiation.
Homepage Deep Dive
-
Technical Credibility: 6/10
Mentions exporting to Vue.js SPA and GitHub integration, which are developer-friendly. However, no architecture diagrams or performance metrics were found. -
Trust & Social Proof: 5/10
Displays logos of companies like L'OrΓ©al and PwC, but lacks developer-specific testimonials or GitHub credibility signals. -
Integration Context: 7/10
Supports REST, GraphQL, Xano, Supabase, Airtable. Great backend compatibility, but lacks SDK/CLI mentions.
Documentation Assessment
-
Documentation Quality: 7/10
Docs include REST API integration and collection setup. However, there is no getting started guide or interactive examples. -
Technical Depth: 6/10
Covers workflows and APIs, but lacks edge case documentation, testing practices, or complete API reference.
Self-Serve Experience
-
Trial Accessibility: 8/10
Free tier available and no credit card required to start building. -
Developer Tooling: 5/10
Mentions CLI tool for components, but it's hidden. Missing Postman collections, testing tools, code snippets.
Community & Support
-
Developer Support Quality: 6/10
Has a community forum and live chat. No GitHub issues, discussions, or strong Stack Overflow presence. -
Learning Resources: 5/10
Tutorials and changelog exist. Missing in-depth blog content, sample apps, and competitive migration guides.
Overall Experience
- Product Cohesion: 5/10
Mix of marketing-heavy and sparse technical content. Needs unified, developer-centric experience.
π© Critical Issues Found
-
Unclear Product Definition
A developer cannot quickly tell what WeWeb is or how it fits into their workflow. Messaging lacks clarity, which delays evaluation. -
Lack of Stack Integration Visibility
While some integrations are supported, they are not emphasized clearly enough in initial touchpoints.
β οΈ Red Flags Identified
| Red Flag | Deduction | Developer Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Buzzword-heavy messaging | -5 | "Marketing fluff over technical substance" |
| No GitHub/code visibility | -3 | "What are they hiding?" |
| No pricing transparency | -4 | "Hidden costs are a red flag" |
| Slow loading times | -3 | "If their site is slow, their service probably is too" |
Total Red Flag Deductions: -15
π― Quick Wins (1β2 Weeks)
-
Add a prominent "Docs" link in top nav
Improves discoverability for developer audiences. -
Include a GitHub link with activity metrics
Establishes transparency and trust. -
Clarify homepage messaging toward developers
Eliminates fluff and communicates developer value. -
Create a clear getting started guide or tutorial
Streamlines onboarding. -
Surface CLI tooling and dev-focused capabilities
Makes developer utilities easier to find and use.
π Strategic Opportunities (1β3 Months)
-
Develop robust API references and SDKs
- Problem: Sparse API documentation
- Impact: Developers need examples and structured guides
- Action: Build API docs + SDKs for JS, Python, etc.
-
Invest in GitHub and Stack Overflow presence
- Problem: No real community footprint
- Impact: Missed engagement and support signals
- Action: Build repos, answer questions, enable discussions
π‘ Competitive Differentiation Opportunities
-
Market WeWeb as a hybrid no-code/low-code dev tool
Emphasize dev control via exports, Vue.js, GitHub, etc. -
Publish technical case studies with architecture diagrams
Earn credibility with devs and technical decision-makers. -
Offer integrations with dev tools (IDE plugins, CI/CD)
Create dev-first workflows that reduce friction.